People who learn to control inner experience will be able to determine the quality of their lives, which is as close as any of us can come to being happy. – Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience)
The Relationship of Print Reading in Tier 1 Instruction and Reading Achievement for Kindergarten Students at Risk of Reading Difficulties by Jeanne Wanzek et al (Learning Disability Quarterly, August 2014)
The title for this study clearly describes the inquiry these four researchers explored. They observed over 100 students at risk of reading difficulties from 26 different kindergarten classrooms for this study. Here is what they found:
- Core classroom instruction is students’ first line of response for reading instruction.
- On average, students were actively engaged in the act of reading print for just over 1.5 minutes (90 seconds) during a 90 minute literacy block. This finding is consistent with related studies.
- Choral reading accounted for 90% of all print engagement during the literacy block.
- The instructional quality of the teacher was not correlated with the amount of time students were actively engaged in the act of reading print.
As you can see, kindergarten students at risk of reading difficulties received lots of instruction in how to read, but few opportunities to actually apply these skills. This occurs in spite of the wealth of evidence that there is a “significant positive correlation in time actively engaged in reading and all three major measures of reading achievement (letter-word identification, word attack skills, passage comprehension)”.
One surprising correlation the researchers found was the amount of time spent in authentic whole classroom instruction, such as think alouds with authentic texts, and increased engagement in reading print. Conversely, small group learning had a less positive association with engagement in reading print. The researchers suspected that while the teacher was meeting with one small group, the rest of the students were doing busy work such as worksheets so he/she could teach.
Wondering + online inquiry = learning by Diane Carver Sekeres et al (Phi Delta Kappan, November 2014)
Four university professors offer a clear framework for scaffolding inquiry-based units and assignments in online spaces. They suggest using a gradual release of responsibility when teaching students how to find, curate, and synthesize information from websites and resources beyond their classroom: Modeled inquiry, structured inquiry, guided inquiry, and open inquiry.
By using structures and scaffolds, several benefits are realized. First, students are given more choice and voice in their school work. Second, teachers are better able to assess whether students are learning and how deeply they have learned the content and skills. Third, families have more access to their child’s progress and final products. Finally, by posing questions as checkpoints along students’ learning journeys, thoughtful reflection can be nurtured and taught when exploring online resources.
Reading in the Wild: Learning from Lifelong Readers by Donalyn Miller (Keynote given at the Wisconsin State Reading Association Convention, February 5, 2015)
This curated list of tweets documents the important points made by Donalyn Miller, author of The Book Whisperer and Reading in the Wild. She spoke passionately about the essential elements needed to grow lifelong readers in schools today. Here are a few of the more popular statements, based on the number of favorites and retweets.
Great list of nonfiction authors from @donalynbooks #wsra15 pic.twitter.com/hOfLbt8uv7
— ⚓Jessica Johnson⚓ (@PrincipalJ) February 5, 2015
No More Language Arts and Crafts | Donalyn Miller great post by @donalynbooks #wsra15 http://t.co/cVYUHHirVs
— ⚓Jessica Johnson⚓ (@PrincipalJ) February 5, 2015
Give learners time to read! @donalynbooks #WSRA15 #sdwwsra pic.twitter.com/6kTCLKTBX0
— Carly Solberg (@CSolberg2) February 5, 2015
https://twitter.com/twhitford/status/563449332872261634
Kids who only read the 5 teacher chosen books a year do not learn how to self-select books, a necessary skill of lifelong readers. #wsra15
— ⚓Jessica Johnson⚓ (@PrincipalJ) February 5, 2015
Why don't more teachers get this? @donalynbooks #WSRA15 pic.twitter.com/97SkN47khD
— Gabrielle Zastrow (@GMZastrow) February 5, 2015
9 different research studies show that choice in reading materials is biggest part of growing as a reader – even in high school #WSRA15
— Pernille Ripp (@pernilleripp) February 5, 2015
Kids need to self select books! Teachers cannot be personal book shoppers for students! @donalynbooks #WSRA15
— Gabrielle Zastrow (@GMZastrow) February 5, 2015
Scaffold readers, build independence by asking students looking for a book: “What is on your to-read list?” -D Miller #WSRA15
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 5, 2015
Our (students) reading plans should include the following four elements: #WSRA15 pic.twitter.com/9HD9ixN9O9
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 5, 2015
Assessing Literacy Assessment by Peter Afflerbach (Session given at the Wisconsin State Reading Association Convention, February 6, 2015)
This presentation by a professor of literacy and assessment at the University of Maryland questioned the usefulness of assessments for promoting deep reading habits. Standardized tests and test prep were specifically targeted as having negative influences on reading achievement during Dr. Afflerbach’s session.
Assessment should provide information that helps students become better readers, and assessment should do no harm. -P Afflerbach #WSRA15
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
The US DOE wants activities to be research-based, yet expect high stakes tests to be used w/ no research to support. -P Afflerbach #WSRA15
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
High stakes tests were not designed for teacher evaluations. -P Afflerbach #WSRA15
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
Construct valid assessments: What do you want to measure? How will you measure it? How accurate will conclusions be? -P Afflerbach #WSRA15
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
The (high stakes) tests we have now, knowing what we know about reading, is almost criminal & certainly embarrassing. -P Afflerbach #WSRA15
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
In a thoughtful assessment system, formative assessment works with summative assessment. -P Afflerbach #WSRA15
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
W/out formative assessment, most instruction is guesswork. Don't be guided by a curriculum guide, but by the student. -P Afflerbach #WSRA15
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
Accountability is MEASURED by a single test on a single day, but… (1/2) #WSRA15
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
…accountability is ACCOMPLISHED with daily, useful assessments that inform our best instruction. -P Afflerbach #WSRA15 (2/2)
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
Teaching students how to self-assess is essential. It causes metacognition, necessary for the #CCSS. -P Afflerbach #WSRA15
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
Types of formative assessments for teaching reading. #WSRA15 pic.twitter.com/JBUu6jdA6P
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
We have to attend to self-efficacy in reading intervention. Why more skill and strategy support, more of the same? -P Afflerbach #WSRA15
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
We continue to pound away on strategy and skill, when it can lead to students feeling unsuccessful and depressed. -P Afflerbach #WSRA15
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
Testing distorts instruction, and other assessments. -P Afflerbach #WSRA15
— Matt Renwick (@ReadByExample) February 6, 2015
Finding Joy in the Quiet Moments by Michael Perry (Wisconsin State Journal, February 1, 2015)
Perry, a self-described “author, humorist, and intermittent pig farmer”, describes the sounds and setting of a day in his life. His youngest daughter was not feeling well. With a pile of books and a box of Kleenex on hand, the rest of the family did their best to go about their day quietly while attending to her needs.
The sounds are backdrop and domestic, deepening in this feeling that in this moment we – the family – are in communion despite our silence.
He concludes his commentary by admitting that there was nothing profound about this “most unassuming sort of evening”. Perry also finds that slowing down and appreciating the present can bring about unique insights.
Joy is elusive, and joy is fleeting. And yet – and this may be the premise of the riddle – those who chase it rarely catch it.
Taking time to reflect…
In public education, there is a strong demand for accountability. Just like in the article about online inquiry projects, there is this need to know what the students were learning and how. On the other end of this spectrum is what we know about learning: that the results of our efforts don’t always appear on a predetermined date. This is especially true when we apply practices that don’t initially appear, at least to the uninformed, to be making an impact on student achievement, such as sustained silent reading.
This practice of allowing students time to read and think about a text of their choosing may go against the grain of what we may believe about education. “If I am not teaching, then the kids are not learning.” It is true that teachers are the most important factor in a classroom. Yet students learn independently all the time. An example is video games. The manuals that come with the games when purchased are sparse and provide the most basic amount of information. The game designers know that much of the learning will happen while the users are actively engaged in playing the game itself.
The same thing often happens when students are independently reading. Given the proper amount of instruction, choice in what to read, access to lots of interesting texts, and time to read and think about their reading, students can often teach themselves how to navigate texts. It can happen even when the comprehension waters get a little choppy. This type of reading environment, so well described by Donalyn Miller, also is a benefit to teachers. It reduces stress, puts more responsibility on the student, and helps the teacher focus on the reader instead of just what they are reading.
The question still remains: How do we know students are making gains and improving as readers when we give them time to read? Too often, classrooms overuse choral reading so teachers can hear the progress students are making, especially in the primary grades. There is also the all-too-real pressure of the looming standardized tests. Based on what I heard at the Wisconsin State Reading Association Convention, these tests are an incredibly poor tool for assessing student and teacher performance (no surprise). And yet, we still use them.
So what is the solution? For teachers, I suggest blocking off at least 20 minutes, and preferably 30 minutes, for uninterrupted daily free choice reading. If your principal questions this, share the research highlighted in this post with him/her. I also recommend checking out publications by Stephen Krashen and Richard Allington. For principals, be thoughtful about scheduling. Give teachers time to allow for these extended periods of silent reading. Reduce or even eliminate announcements. Above all, limit test preparation to the bare minimum.
Michael Perry didn’t provide a quiet environment for his ill daughter because someone told him he should. He did it because it was the right thing to do. We also know what the right thing to do is in our classrooms and schools. By giving students the space and place to be the readers and thinkers they want and are meant to be, we prepare them not only for the test but to be lifelong readers. The 4th graders shared their favorite book quotes on the graffiti board not because it was required, but because the teacher provided them with the time, texts, and permission to do so.